[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ23fmSBaXSwwUby96C00-RgkH9EG8B=cVLV3fSgq5tVVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:36:24 -0700
From: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
stephan@...khronix.com, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
lk <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: cros_ec: Use the proper size when looking at the
cros_ec_i2c result
On 27 June 2014 12:56, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> We know how many bytes the EC should be sending us (which is also the
> number of bytes transferred) and also how many bytes the EC actually
> wanted to send to us. When computing the checksum and copying back
> data let's make sure we take the lesser of the two of those. We'll
> also complain if the EC tried to send us too many bytes. The EC
> sending us too few bytes is legit for when we send the EC an invalid
> command.
>
> This is based on similar code in cros_ec_spi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists