[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140702072338.GC10311@lee--X1>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 08:23:38 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Bill Richardson <wfrichar@...omium.org>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>, sjg@...omium.org,
afaerber@...e.de, stephan@...khronix.com, olof@...om.net,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: cros_ec: Use the proper size when looking at
the cros_ec_i2c result
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote:
> We know how many bytes the EC should be sending us (which is also the
> number of bytes transferred) and also how many bytes the EC actually
> wanted to send to us. When computing the checksum and copying back
> data let's make sure we take the lesser of the two of those. We'll
> also complain if the EC tried to send us too many bytes. The EC
> sending us too few bytes is legit for when we send the EC an invalid
> command.
>
> This is based on similar code in cros_ec_spi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/cros_ec_i2c.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Is this patch orthogonal i.e. can it be applied without the other two
patches?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists