linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] perf/x86/intel: ignore CondChgd bit to avoid false NMI handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:22:01 -0400
From:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"HATAYAMA, Daisuke" <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>, hpa@...or.com,
	matt@...sole-pimps.org, peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/x86/intel: ignore CondChgd bit to avoid false
 NMI handling

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:22:24PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > I'm also interested in the behaviour of CondChgd bit on Ivy Bridge processors.
> 
> The intended meaning of CondChgd is that a hardware debugger has taken over the
> PMU. It shouldn't really be set in other circumstances.

Interesting.  My concern is we have customers that can soft reboot a
machine and have this bit accidentally be enabled.  I am pretty sure they
do not have a hardware debugger attached (I would have to double check).
Is there other ways this can be set?

Cheers,
Don

> 
> I think right now for perf it would be best to just ignore it.
> 
> In theory could stop using the PMU, but if some BIOS set it it would
> completely disable perf there. So better to just ignore it.
> 
> -Andi
> 
> -- 
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/