[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140701150539.GA18309@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:05:39 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use a seperate syscall table as a few
syscalls need to be using the compat syscalls.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:17AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 1e1ebfc..8241ffe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -620,9 +620,14 @@ ENDPROC(ret_from_fork)
> */
> .align 6
> el0_svc:
> - adrp stbl, sys_call_table // load syscall table pointer
> uxtw scno, w8 // syscall number in w8
> mov sc_nr, #__NR_syscalls
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ILP32
> + get_thread_info tsk
> + ldr x16, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS]
> + tbnz x16, #TIF_32BIT_AARCH64, el0_ilp32_svc // We are using ILP32
> +#endif
> + adrp stbl, sys_call_table // load syscall table pointer
This adds a slight penalty on the AArch64 SVC entry path. I can't tell
whether that's visible or not but I think the x86 guys decided to set an
extra bit to the syscall number to distinguish it from native calls.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1da1d11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c
[...]
> +/*
> + * Wrappers to pass the pt_regs argument.
> + */
> +#define sys_rt_sigreturn sys_rt_sigreturn_wrapper
> +
> +
> +/* Using Compat syscalls where necessary */
> +#define sys_ioctl compat_sys_ioctl
> +/* iovec */
> +#define sys_readv compat_sys_readv
> +#define sys_writev compat_sys_writev
> +#define sys_preadv compat_sys_preadv64
> +#define sys_pwritev compat_sys_pwritev64
> +#define sys_vmsplice compat_sys_vmsplice
Do these actually work? compat_iovec has two members of 32-bit each
while the ILP32 iovec has a void * (32-bit) and a __kernel_size_t which
is 64-bit.
> +/* robust_list_head */
> +#define sys_set_robust_list compat_sys_set_robust_list
> +#define sys_get_robust_list compat_sys_get_robust_list
Same here, we have a size_t * argument. The compat function would write
back 32-bit but size_t is 64-bit for ILP32.
> +/* kexec_segment */
> +#define sys_kexec_load compat_sys_kexec_load
More size_t members in the kexec_segment structure (but we don't yet
have kexec on arm64).
> +/* struct msghdr */
> +#define sys_recvfrom compat_sys_recvfrom
Why compat here? struct sockaddr seems to be the same as the native one.
> +#define sys_recvmmsg compat_sys_recvmmsg
> +#define sys_sendmmsg compat_sys_sendmmsg
> +#define sys_sendmsg compat_sys_sendmsg
> +#define sys_recvmsg compat_sys_recvmsg
These get messier as well with a different size_t affecting struct
msghdr.
> +#define sys_setsockopt compat_sys_setsockopt
> +#define sys_getsockopt compat_sys_getsockopt
Looking at the sock_getsockopt() function, we have a union v copied
to/from user. However, such a union contains a struct timeval which for
ILP32 would be different than the compat one.
> +/* iovec */
> +#define sys_process_vm_readv compat_sys_process_vm_readv
> +#define sys_process_vm_writev compat_sys_process_vm_writev
See above for iovec.
> +/* Pointer in struct */
> +#define sys_mount compat_sys_mount
Which structure is this?
> +/* Scheduler */
> +/* unsigned long bitmaps */
> +#define sys_sched_setaffinity compat_sys_sched_setaffinity
> +#define sys_sched_getaffinity compat_sys_sched_getaffinity
Does the long bitmask matter here? I can see the length is passed in
bytes.
> +/* iov usage */
> +#define sys_keyctl compat_sys_keyctl
Same problem as iovec above.
> +/* aio */
> +/* Pointer to Pointer */
> +#define sys_io_setup compat_sys_io_setup
sys_io_setup takes a pointer to aio_context_t which is defined as
__kernel_ulong_t (same as LP64).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists