[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406301658430.4898@eggly.anvils>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm/next] mm: memcontrol: rewrite charge API: fix
shmem_unuse
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 15:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > - return 0;
> > + return -EAGAIN;
>
> Maybe it's time to document the shmem_unuse_inode() return values.
Oh dear. I had hoped they would look after themselves. This one is a
private matter between shmem_unuse_inode and its one caller, just below.
> > + if (error) {
> > + if (error != -ENOMEM)
> > + error = 0;
> > mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg);
> > } else
> > mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, true);
>
> If I'm reading this correctly, shmem_unuse() can now return -EAGAIN and
> that can get all the way back to userspace. `man 2 swapoff' doesn't
> know this...
if (error) {
if (error != -ENOMEM)
error = 0;
...
return error;
So the only values returned from shmem_unuse_inode() to its caller
try_to_unuse() are 0 and -ENOMEM. Those may get passed back to the
user, but -EAGAIN was just an internal shmem.c detail.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists