[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B216C5.8020503@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:02:45 -0700
From: Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
To: Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
이건호 <gunho.lee@....com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CMA page migration failure due to buffers on bh_lru
On 6/30/2014 6:07 PM, Gioh Kim wrote:
> Hi,Laura.
>
> I have a question.
>
> Does the __evict_bh_lru() not need bh_lru_lock()?
> The get_cpu_var() has already preenpt_disable() and can prevent other thread.
> But get_cpu_var cannot prevent IRQ context such like page-fault.
> I think if a page-fault occured and a file is read in IRQ context it can change cpu-lru.
>
> Is my concern correct?
>
>
__evict_bh_lru is called via on_each_cpu_cond which I believe will disable irqs.
I based the code on the existing invalidate_bh_lru which did not take the bh_lru_lock
either. It's possible I missed something though.
Thanks,
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists