[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyrDNVcT3meKTaaXhh4q4z1=g7zO_==mFb5Lhh70haScg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:04:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jérôme Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
Jatin Kumar <jakumar@...dia.com>,
Subhash Gutti <sgutti@...dia.com>,
Lucien Dunning <ldunning@...dia.com>,
Cameron Buschardt <cabuschardt@...dia.com>,
Arvind Gopalakrishnan <arvindg@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
Duncan Poole <dpoole@...dia.com>,
Oded Gabbay <Oded.Gabbay@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
Andrew Lewycky <Andrew.Lewycky@....com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mmu_notifier: pass through vma to invalidate_range
and invalidate_page
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Jérôme Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This needs small refactoring in memory.c to call invalidate_range on
> vma boundary the overhead should be low enough.
.. and looking at it, doesn't that mean that the whole invalidate call
should be moved inside unmap_single_vma() then, instead of being
duplicated in all the callers?
I really get the feeling that somebody needs to go over this
patch-series with a fine comb to fix these kinds of ugly things.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists