linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 49/50] mars: generic pre-patch for mars

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140702082400.GB10971@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jul 2014 01:24:00 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <tst@...oebel-theuer.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Schöbel-Theuer <tst@...d1.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 49/50] mars: generic pre-patch for mars


A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Thomas Schoebel-Theuer wrote:
> I will prepare a new version ASAP.
> 
> Is the asmlinkage one of the reasons?

No.  The wholesale exporting of all 300+ syscall functions for no
apparent reasoning is the reason.

> If so, some additional wrappers like vfs_* or kernel_* would have to be
> written. This would also complicate portability between the out-of-tree
> and the in-tree version of MARS (which I have to maintain in parallel at
> least for some years).

Maintaining out of tree code is not our problem, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/