[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B3F687.5050502@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:09:43 +0200
From: Pascal Huerst <pascal.huerst@...il.com>
To: santosh.shilimkar@...com
CC: khilman@...prootsystems.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
gnurou@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: gpio-omap: wakeup mask
Hi everyone,
we have a device with an am335x and are using some gpios on bank0 to
wake up the device from suspend to ram.
We have some user buttons which are configured in the devicetree as
gpio-keys and one power-key which should wake up the device:
&buttons {
power {
label = "Power";
gpios = <&gpio0 6 1>;
linux,code = <116>;
gpio-key,wakeup;
};
one {
label = "One";
gpios = <&gpio0 11 1>;
linux,code = <2>;
};
: : :
}
The problem is, that the device wakes up on any trigger on bank 0. No
matter which button was pressed. "gpio-key,wakeup" seems not to have any
influence.
Now, if I comment the following lines out in drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c :
set_gpio_trigger(...).
321
322 if (likely(!(bank->non_wakeup_gpios & gpio_bit))) {
323 _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, gpio_bit, trigger != 0);
324 bank->context.wake_en =
325 readl_relaxed(bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_en);
326 }
327
Everything works as expected. But I don't really understand why? Is this
a bug, or does this break something else I have not discovered yet?
Thanks,
Pascal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists