lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B3F687.5050502@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:09:43 +0200
From:	Pascal Huerst <pascal.huerst@...il.com>
To:	santosh.shilimkar@...com
CC:	khilman@...prootsystems.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	gnurou@...il.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: gpio-omap: wakeup mask

Hi everyone,

we have a device with an am335x and are using some gpios on bank0 to
wake up the device from suspend to ram.

We have some user buttons which are configured in the devicetree as
gpio-keys and one power-key which should wake up the device:

&buttons {
        power {
                label = "Power";
                gpios = <&gpio0 6 1>;
                linux,code = <116>;
                gpio-key,wakeup;
        };

        one {
                label = "One";
                gpios = <&gpio0 11 1>;
                linux,code = <2>;
        };

        : : :
}

The problem is, that the device wakes up on any trigger on bank 0. No
matter which button was pressed. "gpio-key,wakeup" seems not to have any
influence.

Now, if I comment the following lines out in drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c :
set_gpio_trigger(...).

321
322 if (likely(!(bank->non_wakeup_gpios & gpio_bit))) {
323    _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, gpio_bit, trigger != 0);
324      bank->context.wake_en =
325        readl_relaxed(bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_en);
326 }
327

Everything works as expected. But I don't really understand why? Is this
a bug, or does this break something else I have not discovered yet?

Thanks,
Pascal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ