lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140704072752.GC28884@atomide.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:27:53 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pascal Huerst <pascal.huerst@...il.com>
Cc:	santosh.shilimkar@...com, khilman@...prootsystems.com,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Subject: Re: gpio-omap: wakeup mask

* Pascal Huerst <pascal.huerst@...il.com> [140702 05:12]:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> we have a device with an am335x and are using some gpios on bank0 to
> wake up the device from suspend to ram.
> 
> We have some user buttons which are configured in the devicetree as
> gpio-keys and one power-key which should wake up the device:
> 
> &buttons {
>         power {
>                 label = "Power";
>                 gpios = <&gpio0 6 1>;
>                 linux,code = <116>;
>                 gpio-key,wakeup;
>         };
> 
>         one {
>                 label = "One";
>                 gpios = <&gpio0 11 1>;
>                 linux,code = <2>;
>         };
> 
>         : : :
> }
> 
> The problem is, that the device wakes up on any trigger on bank 0. No
> matter which button was pressed. "gpio-key,wakeup" seems not to have any
> influence.
> 
> Now, if I comment the following lines out in drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c :
> set_gpio_trigger(...).
> 
> 321
> 322 if (likely(!(bank->non_wakeup_gpios & gpio_bit))) {
> 323    _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, gpio_bit, trigger != 0);
> 324      bank->context.wake_en =
> 325        readl_relaxed(bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_en);
> 326 }
> 327
> 
> Everything works as expected. But I don't really understand why? Is this
> a bug, or does this break something else I have not discovered yet?

The GPIO wake-up events are working from off-idle for omap3
the last time I checked, so sounds like this is some am335x
related issue.

What does your bank->context.wake_en mask get set to with this code?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ