[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B4A718.3050702@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:43:04 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: rjw@...ysocki.net, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arvind.chauhan@....com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, spk.linux@...il.com,
thomas.ab@...sung.com, nm@...com, t.figa@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization
code to ->init()
On 07/01/14 09:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +static int cpu0_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> + struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
This..
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct private_data *priv;
> +
[...]
> ing them.
> @@ -223,28 +242,92 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "running cpufreq without cooling device: %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(cdev));
> }
> -
> of_node_put(np);
> +
> + priv->cdev = cdev;
Causes a build warning:
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-generic.c:313:13: warning: 'cdev' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
So I guess we should initialize it to NULL?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists