[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53B50EFD.2070007@st.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:06:21 +0200
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com>,
<patrice.chotard@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add reset controllers for STiH407 SoC
On 07/02/2014 06:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 02.07.2014, 15:08 +0100 schrieb Peter Griffin:
>>> This series adds reset controller support for the STiH407 SoC.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1
>>> - Update copyright to 2014
>>> - Add const qualifier
>>> - Fix various whitespace issues
>>> - Remove THIS_OWNER
>>> - Move DT documentation into separate patch
>>>
>>> Peter Griffin (4):
>>> reset: stih407: Add softreset, powerdown and picophy controllers
>>> reset: sti: Document sti-picophyreset controllers bindings.
>>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 Kconfig entry to select STIH407_RESET
>>> ARM: sti: Add STiH407 reset controller support.
>>>
>>> .../bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt | 42 ++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407.dtsi | 16 +++
>>> arch/arm/mach-sti/Kconfig | 10 ++
>>> drivers/reset/sti/Kconfig | 4 +
>>> drivers/reset/sti/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> .../dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h | 61 ++++++++
>>> 7 files changed, 292 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/st,sti-picophyreset.txt
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/reset/sti/reset-stih407.c
>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/stih407-resets.h
>>
>> Looks good to me now.
>>
>> Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
>
> Do you have a tree for Reset? If not, which route do these patches
> normally follow?
>
I will queue patch 4 to STi DT branch for v3.17.
For now, no nodes uses reset for STiH407, so we don't need the
dt-bindings header file in the STi tree.
If we have a DT node using a reset line before my pull-request, I might
have to integrate the series in the STi DT branch.
Philipp, does that sound reasonable?
Regards,
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists