[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1404459477.27680.10.camel@x220>
Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:37:57 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: usb: gadget: net2280: CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES?
Commit e56e69cc0ff4 ("usb: gadget: net2280: Use pr_* function") is
included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20140704).
It contains this odd chunk:
@@ -1566,7 +1563,7 @@ static const struct usb_gadget_ops net2280_ops = {
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DEBUG_FILES
+#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES
/* FIXME move these into procfs, and use seq_file.
* Sysfs _still_ doesn't behave for arbitrarily sized files,
(Commit b7ca96655ddd ("usb: gadget: Gadget directory cleanup - group UDC
drivers"), also included in today's linux-next, moved that new check for
CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES to drivers/usb/gadget/udc/net2280.c.)
Using CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES appears to be just an editing
mistake. Would Ricardo like to submit the trivial patch to clean it up
or should I do that?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists