[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPybu_3WMWDiVrvLKfOyyw7nSfXi9O82JcXKprZq24j05BxDWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:27:42 +0200
From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: usb: gadget: net2280: CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES?
My fault. Thank you very much for reporting it. I have just posted the patch
Regards
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> Commit e56e69cc0ff4 ("usb: gadget: net2280: Use pr_* function") is
> included in today's linux-next (ie, next-20140704).
>
> It contains this odd chunk:
> @@ -1566,7 +1563,7 @@ static const struct usb_gadget_ops net2280_ops = {
>
> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DEBUG_FILES
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES
>
> /* FIXME move these into procfs, and use seq_file.
> * Sysfs _still_ doesn't behave for arbitrarily sized files,
>
> (Commit b7ca96655ddd ("usb: gadget: Gadget directory cleanup - group UDC
> drivers"), also included in today's linux-next, moved that new check for
> CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES to drivers/usb/gadget/udc/net2280.c.)
>
> Using CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PDEBUG_FILES appears to be just an editing
> mistake. Would Ricardo like to submit the trivial patch to clean it up
> or should I do that?
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
--
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists