linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:20:45 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, riel@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread
 wakeups

On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 08:01:34AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 22:05 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: 
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 05:23:56AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > > Turn it on and don't worry about it is exactly what distros want the
> > > obscure feature with very few users to be.  Last time I did a drive-by,
> > > my boxen said I should continue to worry about it ;-)
> > 
> > Yep, which is the reason for the patch on the last email.
> > 
> > Then again, exactly which feature and which reason for worry?
> 
> NO_HZ_FULL.  I tried ALL a while back, box instantly called me an idiot.
> Maybe that has improved since, dunno.

Ah, I was thinking in terms of RCU_CPU_NOCB.

> Last drive-by I didn't do much overhead measurement, stuck mostly
> functionality, and it still had rough edges that enterprise users may
> not fully appreciate.  Trying to let 60 of 64 cores do 100% compute
> showed some cores having a hard time entering tickless at all, and
> ~200us spikes that I think are due to tick losing skew.. told Frederic
> I'd take a peek at that, but haven't had time yet.  There were other
> known things as well, like timers and workqueues for which there are
> patches floating around.  All in all, it was waving the men at work
> sign, pointing at the "Say N" by the config option, and suggesting that
> ignoring that would not be the cleverest of moves.

Well, I am not going to join a debate on Kconfig default selection.  ;-)
I will say that two years ago, setting NO_HZ_FULL=y by default would
have been insane.  Perhaps soon it will be a no-brainer, and I am of
course trying to bring that day closer.  Right now it is of course a
judgment call.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/