[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 23:16:11 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig
On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Since EC (Embedded controller) needs SCI for the interupt which
> is not available on ARM64, make the EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64
> only in the Kconfig file.
>
> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> index 0e6f72d..7de5e3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
>
> config ACPI_EC_DEBUGFS
> tristate "EC read/write access through /sys/kernel/debug/ec"
> + depends on X86 || IA64
This is totally inconsistent with the other patches in the series where you
define per-arch symbols for similar things. In addition to that, do we need
to build ec.c on ARM at all?
> default n
> help
> Say N to disable Embedded Controller /sys/kernel/debug interface
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists