linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53BBB884.5000005@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2014 17:23:16 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Make EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64 in Kconfig

On 2014年07月08日 05:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 04:47:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> Since EC (Embedded controller) needs SCI for the interupt which
>> is not available on ARM64, make the EC debugfs depend on X86 || IA64
>> only in the Kconfig file.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/Kconfig |    1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index 0e6f72d..7de5e3f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ config ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
>>  
>>  config ACPI_EC_DEBUGFS
>>  	tristate "EC read/write access through /sys/kernel/debug/ec"
>> +	depends on X86 || IA64
> This is totally inconsistent with the other patches in the series where you
> define per-arch symbols for similar things.  In addition to that, do we need
> to build ec.c on ARM at all?

Yes, EC will be needed on ARM. This patch is not needed after some more
consideration, I will drop it.

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/