[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1404807066.26126.9.camel@x220>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 10:11:06 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/17] rcu: remove CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY
Paul,
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:38 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY Kconfig parameter doesn't appear to be very
> effective at finding race conditions, so this commit removes it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 -----
> kernel/rcu/update.c | 3 ---
The commit explanation implies that this patch would also remove the
entry for PROVE_RCU_DELAY in lib/Kconfig.debug. Is there any reason to
keep it after this patch?
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE01 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE02-T | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE03 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE04 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE05 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE06 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE07 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08 | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE08-T | 1 -
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/rcu/TREE09 | 1 -
> 13 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
This doesn't touch a few other references in
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/. I have no idea how these tests
work, so I assume these references are still needed. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists