[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140708080636.GK13423@lukather>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 10:06:36 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: linux@...im.org.za, Nicolas FERRE <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
dwmw2@...radead.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris@...e-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] AT91: Call at91_register_devices in the board files
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 08:42:39PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 16:52 Thu 03 Jul , Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:29:58PM +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > no do this at SoC level
> >
> > Since it has to be done at init_machine, I don't see any other easy
> > way to do this at the SoC level.
> >
> > What is your suggestion?
>
> do it earlier as there is not driver it will not change anything
My question remains. When should I do so?
at91_initialize is too early to register any devices.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists