linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1404941347.14643.57.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:29:07 -0400
From:	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	keyrings <keyrings@...ux-nfs.org>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of
 trust

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 19:56 +0100, David Howells wrote: 
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, that's fine.  My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring
> > patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should
> > be upstreamed regardless of the other patches.
> 
> There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from
> my pkcs#7 patches.

Right, x509_request_asymmetric_key() is the same as
pkcs7_request_asymmetric_key().

Mimi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/