[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8975.1404932208@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:56:48 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, keyrings <keyrings@...ux-nfs.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's fine. My concern, however, is that the trusted keyring
> patches are independent of the other patches being upstreamed and should
> be upstreamed regardless of the other patches.
There is overlap in the X.509 certificate request function that you took from
my pkcs#7 patches.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists