[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140709083509.GQ13423@lukather>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:35:09 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a case for a common efuse API?
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:00:23PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On MSM chips we have some efuses (called qfprom) where we store things
> like calibration data, speed bins, etc. We need to read out data from
> the efuses in various drivers like the cpufreq, thermal, etc. This
> essentially boils down to a bunch of readls on the efuse from a handful
> of different drivers. In devicetree this looks a little odd because
> these drivers end up having an extra reg property (or two) that points
> to a register in the efuse and some length, i.e you see this:
>
> thermal-sensor@...00 {
> compatible = "sensor";
> reg = <0x34000 0x1000>, <0x10018 0xc>;
> reg-names = "sensor", "efuse_calib";
> }
>
>
> I imagine in DT we want something more like this:
>
> efuse: efuse@...00 {
> compatible = "efuse";
> reg = <0x10000 0x1000>;
> }
>
> thermal-sensor@...00 {
> compatible = "sensor";
> reg = <0x34000 0x1000>;
> efuse = <&efuse 0x18>;
> }
We have pretty much the same things in the Allwinner SoCs. We have an
efuse directly mapped into memory, with a few informations like a MAC
address, the SoC ID, the serial number, some RSA keys for the device,
etc.
The thing is, some boards expose these informations in an external
EEPROM as well.
I started working and went quite far to create an "eeprom" framework
to handle these cases, with a dt representation similar to what you
were exposing.
https://github.com/mripard/linux/tree/eeprom-framework-at24
It was working quite well, I was about to send it, but was told that I
should all be moved to MTD, and given up on it.
Anyway, +1 for this :)
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists