[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvyAUEB+zAi2b4fBATNzgRpb8L9AYN--mP9hbvvHv7yG6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:57:19 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, khilman@...aro.org,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: TIckless Timers On Laptops and Battery Enabled Devices
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
> I am been thinking , this is just a idea but can we enable the kernel
> to be tick less for laptops when they are on battery. I don't have any
> laptop on me to test but if
> someone can test the battery on a tick less kernel versus non tick
> less to see if it increases battery. It would be good if we can test
> when it's in standby , high cpu usage
> and average work to see if it's a good idea to enable a tick less
> kernel for default when a user is on battery for laptops and perhaps
> even get into the embedded boards
> that run on battery and/or cellphones if it's a great help in
> increasing battery. I will also be glad to help these features into
> the mainline kernel if they are of use to saving
> battery.
> Cheers Nick
Seriously, are you trolling us?
This can't be real.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists