[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDOMVhZr=rP_7Bsez==4LzScZxsQnfpaiYpvGRuHCf9WnqHTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 22:22:23 -0400
From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
To: fweisbec@...il.com
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, khilman@...aro.org,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: TIckless Timers On Laptops and Battery Enabled Devices
I am been thinking , this is just a idea but can we enable the kernel
to be tick less for laptops when they are on battery. I don't have any
laptop on me to test but if
someone can test the battery on a tick less kernel versus non tick
less to see if it increases battery. It would be good if we can test
when it's in standby , high cpu usage
and average work to see if it's a good idea to enable a tick less
kernel for default when a user is on battery for laptops and perhaps
even get into the embedded boards
that run on battery and/or cellphones if it's a great help in
increasing battery. I will also be glad to help these features into
the mainline kernel if they are of use to saving
battery.
Cheers Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists