[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140709105441.GE9485@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 11:54:41 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Olav Haugan <ohaugan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
"mitchelh@...eaurora.org" <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:07:38AM +0100, Olav Haugan wrote:
> On 6/30/2014 2:52 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:23:27PM +0100, Olav Haugan wrote:
> >> Lets say I have an IOMMU with 2 masters and 2 SMRn slots with the
> >> following stream IDs coming from the masters:
> >>
> >> Master 1: 0x21, 0x22, 0x23, 0x24, 0x25, 0x26, 0x27, 0x28
> >> Master 2: 0x30
> >>
> >> To make this work I would program SMR[0] with StreamID 0x20 and mask 0xF
> >> to ignore lower 4 bits. SMR[1] would just be StreamID 0x30 with mask 0x0.
> >>
> >> However, I could also have an IOMMU with 2 masters and 9 SMRn slots with
> >> the following stream IDs:
> >>
> >> Master 1: 0x21, 0x22, 0x23, 0x24, 0x25, 0x26, 0x27, 0x28
> >> Master 2: 0x29
> >>
> >> Here I would program all SMRn and leave the mask to be 0 for all SMRn's.
> >> So how do I detect when to apply a mask or not?
> >
> > You would aim to use the smallest number of SMRs per master possible.
> > You could probably use:
> >
> > Master 1: SMR[0].id == 0x20, SMR[0].mask = 0x07
> > SMR[1].id == 0x28, SMR[1].mask = 0x00
> >
> > Master 2: SMR[2].id == 0x29, SMR[2].mask = 0x00
>
> So how does an algorithm figure this out in both my examples? The
> algorithm would have to know about both (all) bus masters and their
> stream IDs for a specific SMMU. If the algorithm operates on the set of
> stream IDs for one bus master at a time the algorithm has no way of
> knowing which bits can be ignored since it doesn't know the value of the
> other stream IDs for the other bus masters and thus could potentially
> create a mask that could cause a stream ID to match in two different
> entries.
Complete knowledge of the system topology (i.e. all bus masters) is a
requirement for being able to configure the SMMU correctly if you want to
guarantee that you don't have SMR aliasing issues.
> >> I am not familiar with Andreas's proposal. Do you have a link?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=139110598005846&w=2
>
> Unless I am mistaken the algorithm works on one bus master at a time. I
> don't think that will work.
IIRC, it works for densely packed SIDs on the master, so it tries to build
up power-of-2 sized groups for that master then mops up the rest with
individual entries.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists