linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH RESEND -next 03/21] x86: add kasan hooks fort memcpy/memmove/memset functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:31:58 -0700
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexey Preobrazhensky <preobr@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
	Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@...il.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH RESEND -next 03/21] x86: add kasan hooks fort memcpy/memmove/memset functions

Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com> writes:
> +
> +#undef memcpy
> +void *kasan_memset(void *ptr, int val, size_t len);
> +void *kasan_memcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len);
> +void *kasan_memmove(void *dst, const void *src, size_t len);
> +
> +#define memcpy(dst, src, len) kasan_memcpy((dst), (src), (len))
> +#define memset(ptr, val, len) kasan_memset((ptr), (val), (len))
> +#define memmove(dst, src, len) kasan_memmove((dst), (src), (len))

I don't think just define is enough, gcc can call these functions
implicitely too (both with and without __). For example for a struct copy.

You need to have true linker level aliases. 

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/