[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87egxunx8j.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:33:16 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexey Preobrazhensky <preobr@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <adech.fo@...il.com>,
Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH RESEND -next 05/21] x86: cpu: don't sanitize early stages of a secondary CPU boot
Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com> writes:
> Instrumentation of this files may result in unbootable machine.
This doesn't make sense. Is the code not NMI safe?
If yes that would need to be fixed because
Please debug more.
perf is a common source of bugs (see Vice Weaver's fuzzer results),
so it would be good to have this functionality for it.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists