lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:21:32 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc:	Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
	Paul Parsons <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: devres: Introduce the function devm_request_gpio_array

On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Rob Jones <rob.jones@...ethink.co.uk> wrote:

> Please note that I submitted a patch on 02/07/14 to create this
> function which was acked by Linus Walleij on 05/07/14.
>
> Great minds think alike, and all that.

My mind certainly isn't any great :-(

My left hand seems to be unaware of what the right hand is doing.

Did I ACK that for merging through some other tree then?

And I guess if Himangi want to submit these ASoC patches, they
will have to go through the same tree as those patches in that case?

And would you consider implementing a gpiod version...?

> However, I think that the version I submitted better replicates the
> original (non devm) functionality, see below.
>
> I didn't, however, add it to the documentation. +1 on that.

Can you include that oneliner in your patch then to reduce
problems?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists