lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:01:28 +0100
From:	Rob Jones <>
To:	Linus Walleij <>
CC:	Himangi Saraogi <>,
	Alexandre Courbot <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	Randy Dunlap <>,
	"" <>,
	Liam Girdwood <>,
	Mark Brown <>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <>, Takashi Iwai <>,,
	"" <>,
	Eric Miao <>,
	Russell King <>,
	Haojian Zhuang <>,
	Philipp Zabel <>,
	Paul Parsons <>,
	Julia Lawall <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: devres: Introduce the function devm_request_gpio_array

On 10/07/14 10:21, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Rob Jones <> wrote:
>> Please note that I submitted a patch on 02/07/14 to create this
>> function which was acked by Linus Walleij on 05/07/14.
>> Great minds think alike, and all that.
> My mind certainly isn't any great :-(

I doubt that :-)

> My left hand seems to be unaware of what the right hand is doing.
> Did I ACK that for merging through some other tree then?

You did:

> And I guess if Himangi want to submit these ASoC patches, they
> will have to go through the same tree as those patches in that case?

I don't know enough to comment.

> And would you consider implementing a gpiod version...?

I will certainly consider it. I'm in the middle of something else right
now but I should be available in a day or two and I'll have a look.

>> However, I think that the version I submitted better replicates the
>> original (non devm) functionality, see below.
>> I didn't, however, add it to the documentation. +1 on that.
> Can you include that oneliner in your patch then to reduce
> problems?

Certainly, with acknowledgement to Himangi Saraogi. Should I resubmit
the patch series with amendment or should I put it in as a separate
patch? Sorry for the noobie question but I *am* new to the kernel

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
tel:+44 161 236 5575
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists