linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Move -Wmaybe-uninitialized to W=1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:03:14 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>,
	x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Move -Wmaybe-uninitialized to W=1

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:42 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I haven't even wished for it but just to prove everybody my point: just
> built rc4+ from Linus' repo with gcc 4.9.0, see below.
> 
> Now all of a sudden there's more noise, maybe because this is a
> different .config. However, I doubt those are real bugs.

Would you mind sharing that .config?

> A cursory look through those shows that they're not really bugs -
> gcc simply can't know with all the ifdeffery, partial usage based on

Nit: I'd expect ifdeffery to make the code only difficult to understand
for the human reader. By the time gcc will be doing flow analysis the
preprocessor has long handled all ifdeffery.

> conditionals, etc, etc.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/