lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:03:14 +0200 From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Move -Wmaybe-uninitialized to W=1 On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:42 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > I haven't even wished for it but just to prove everybody my point: just > built rc4+ from Linus' repo with gcc 4.9.0, see below. > > Now all of a sudden there's more noise, maybe because this is a > different .config. However, I doubt those are real bugs. Would you mind sharing that .config? > A cursory look through those shows that they're not really bugs - > gcc simply can't know with all the ifdeffery, partial usage based on Nit: I'd expect ifdeffery to make the code only difficult to understand for the human reader. By the time gcc will be doing flow analysis the preprocessor has long handled all ifdeffery. > conditionals, etc, etc. Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists