[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710104223.GD2970@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:42:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: Move -Wmaybe-uninitialized to W=1
And,
I haven't even wished for it but just to prove everybody my point: just
built rc4+ from Linus' repo with gcc 4.9.0, see below.
Now all of a sudden there's more noise, maybe because this is a
different .config. However, I doubt those are real bugs.
A cursory look through those shows that they're not really bugs -
gcc simply can't know with all the ifdeffery, partial usage based on
conditionals, etc, etc.
---
In file included from scripts/sortextable.c:194:0:
scripts/sortextable.c: In function ‘main’:
scripts/sortextable.h:176:3: warning: ‘relocs_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
memset(relocs, 0, relocs_size);
^
scripts/sortextable.h:106:6: note: ‘relocs_size’ was declared here
int relocs_size;
^
In file included from scripts/sortextable.c:192:0:
scripts/sortextable.h:176:3: warning: ‘relocs_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
memset(relocs, 0, relocs_size);
^
scripts/sortextable.h:106:6: note: ‘relocs_size’ was declared here
int relocs_size;
^
fs/namespace.c: In function ‘SyS_mount’:
fs/namespace.c:2647:8: warning: ‘kernel_dev’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
ret = do_mount(kernel_dev, kernel_dir->name, kernel_type, flags,
^
fs/namespace.c:2626:8: note: ‘kernel_dev’ was declared here
char *kernel_dev;
^
fs/namespace.c:2647:8: warning: ‘kernel_type’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
ret = do_mount(kernel_dev, kernel_dir->name, kernel_type, flags,
^
fs/namespace.c:2624:8: note: ‘kernel_type’ was declared here
char *kernel_type;
^
fs/direct-io.c: In function ‘do_blockdev_direct_IO’:
fs/direct-io.c:920:9: warning: ‘to’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
while (from < to) {
^
fs/direct-io.c:913:16: note: ‘to’ was declared here
size_t from, to;
^
fs/direct-io.c:1034:9: warning: ‘from’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
from += this_chunk_bytes;
^
fs/direct-io.c:913:10: note: ‘from’ was declared here
size_t from, to;
^
In file included from include/net/inetpeer.h:15:0,
from net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c:16:
net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c: In function ‘tcp_peer_is_proven’:
include/net/ipv6.h:422:38: warning: ‘*((void *)&daddr+8)’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
return ((ul1[0] ^ ul2[0]) | (ul1[1] ^ ul2[1])) == 0UL;
^
net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c:231:30: note: ‘*((void *)&daddr+8)’ was declared here
struct inetpeer_addr saddr, daddr;
^
In file included from include/net/inetpeer.h:15:0,
from net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c:16:
include/net/ipv6.h:422:38: warning: ‘*((void *)&saddr+8)’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
return ((ul1[0] ^ ul2[0]) | (ul1[1] ^ ul2[1])) == 0UL;
^
net/ipv4/tcp_metrics.c:231:23: note: ‘*((void *)&saddr+8)’ was declared here
struct inetpeer_addr saddr, daddr;
^
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists