[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710111833.GY3935@laptop>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:18:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com, efault@....de,
nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher
capacity
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:05:39PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> + /*
> + * If the CPUs share their cache and the src_cpu's capacity is
> + * reduced because of other sched_class or IRQs, we trig an
> + * active balance to move the task
> + */
> + if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)
> + && ((capacity_orig_of(src_cpu) * 100) > (capacity_of(src_cpu) *
> + sd->imbalance_pct)))
> return 1;
Why is this tied to shared caches?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists