[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=KUktq8XJv7Ayis1Q3ik+Wh3wb8wN6VpRAtOsbbv9XCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:49:52 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: cpu0: OPPs can be populated at runtime
On 9 July 2014 20:14, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
> Assuming you are updating bidnings as suggested by Stephen,
> patch looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Why do you still have a separate cpufreq driver for omap?
Would this patch help getting that out?
I see this for omap:
static inline void omap_init_cpufreq(void)
{
struct platform_device_info devinfo = { };
if (!of_have_populated_dt())
devinfo.name = "omap-cpufreq";
else
devinfo.name = "cpufreq-generic";
platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);
}
and it makes me believe that you were just waiting for this patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists