[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710131307.GI2728@katana>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:13:07 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] i2c: drop class based instantiaion for selected
drivers
> > + /* Warn that the adapter lost class based instantiation */
> > + if (adapter->class == I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED) {
> > + dev_dbg(&adapter->dev,
> > + "This adapter dropped support for I2C classes and "
> > + "won't auto-detect %s devices anymore. If you need it, check "
> > + "'Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices' for alternatives.\n",
> >
> It's usually a bad idea to split kernel messages across source lines
Yes, "usually". Not for this message, though, it's specific. The lines
would have been quite long.
> You could at least do the split at the sentence boundary.
OK, this would have been a compromise.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists