[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201407101514.16530.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:14:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Use include/asm-generic/io.h
On Thursday 10 July 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > @@ -235,8 +155,7 @@ extern void __iomem *ioremap_cache(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size);
> > #define ioremap_wc(addr, size) __ioremap((addr), (size), __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL_NC))
> > #define iounmap __iounmap
> >
> > -#define ARCH_HAS_IOREMAP_WC
> > -#include <asm-generic/iomap.h>
> > +#include <asm-generic/io.h>
>
> We don't currently have PCIe support in mainline for arm64 but what I
> had in mind with the generic iomap is that functions like ioread32_rep
> first check whether the address is an IO address or a memory one and
> calls the insl or mmio_insl accordingly. With your generic
> implementation, this check disappears.
>
> The question is whether this functionality would still be needed.
I think it's much better not to have that check on architectures that have a memory
mapped I/O space like arm64. The main advantage is that ioread32() is just a trivial
alias for readl(). The only reason for needing generic_iomap is architectures that
do something very different for I/O ports.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists