lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:16:46 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com, efault@....de,
	nicolas.pitre@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under
 CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED"

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:05:40PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This reverts commit f5f9739d7a0ccbdcf913a0b3604b134129d14f7e.
> 
> We are going to use runnable_avg_sum and runnable_avg_period in order to get
> the utilization of the CPU. This statistic includes all tasks that run the CPU
> and not only CFS tasks.

But this rq->avg is not the one that is migration aware, right? So why
use this?

We already compensate cpu_capacity for !fair tasks, so I don't see why
we can't use the migration aware one (and kill this one as Yuyang keeps
proposing) and compensate with the capacity factor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists