linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: tps65218: Add fixed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140710145023.GH30458@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:50:23 +0200
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Keerthy <a0393675@...com>
Cc:	Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@....com, galak@...eaurora.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, balbi@...com, tony@...mide.com,
	kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] regulator: tps65218: Add fixed_uV fields for dcdc5
 and dcdc6

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:40:39PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 05:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >Applied, but don't bury new patches into the middle of old threads -
> >it's a good way to get your patch ignored.

> Okay. I thought only one patch had to be redone on top of the other branch
> so did it this way. I will resend a new series next time onwards. Thanks.

For something like this where there's actually no dependencies it's OK
to resend the patch as a standalone thing.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)