[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710165225.0991f478@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:52:25 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey@....msu.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org,
hsommer@....org, matwey.kornilov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] Add force_epp module option for parport_pc.
> module parameters are horrid, how is someone supposed to know to use
> this? Why can't we "fix" the detection logic? You just now broke
> systems that were working by forcing them to now set a module option
> where previously they didn't, so I can't take these patches as-is,
> sorry.
Can we not just add "if the CPU is PPro or higher than all is fine" ? to
the test ?
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists