[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42827.1405012013@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:06:53 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: keyrings@...ux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH06/17] PKCS#7: Verify internal certificate chain
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:16:04 +0100, David Howells said:
> Verify certificate chain in the X.509 certificates contained within the PKCS#7
> message as far as possible. If any signature that we should be able to verify
> fails, we reject the whole lot.
What happens if we see a signature that we shouldn't be able to verify? Or should
that changelog entry be reduced to "If any signature fails", period?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists