lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140710060155.GA7675@lst.de>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:01:55 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@...ionio.com>,
	Robert Elliott <Elliott@...com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] scsi: convert device_busy to atomic_t

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:49:56AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> As far as I can tell from the block MQ, we get one CPU thread per LUN.

No, that's entirely incorrect.  IFF a device supports multiple hardware
queues we only submit I/O from CPUs (there might be more than one) this
queue is bound to.  With the single hardware queue supported by most
hardware submissions can and will happen from any CPU.  Note that
this patchset doesn't even support multiple hardware queues yet, although
it should be fairly simple to add once the low level driver support is
ready.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ