lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2014 08:06:17 +0200
From:	Christoph Hellwig <>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	James Bottomley <>,
	Jens Axboe <>,
	Bart Van Assche <>,
	Robert Elliott <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked
	counter mess

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:12:17PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hmm. I guess there is a race window between
> atomic_read() and atomic_set().
> Doesn't this cause issues when someone calls atomic_set() just before the 
> call to atomic_read?

There is a race window just _after_ the atomic_read, but it's harmless.
The whole _blocked scheme is a backoff to avoid resubmitting I/O all
the time when the HBA or target returned a busy status.  If we race
an incorrectly reset it we will submit I/O and just get a busy indicator

On the other hand doing the atomic_set all the time introduces three atomic
in the I/O completion part that are entirely pointless most of the time.

I guess I should add something like this as a comment to the code..

Note that the old code didn't use any sort of synchronization either.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists