| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <53C0F921.2030909@amd.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 11:00:17 +0200
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
CC: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@...il.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
Andrew Lewycky <Andrew.Lewycky@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/83] drm/radeon: reduce number of free VMIDs and pipes
in KV
Am 11.07.2014 18:22, schrieb Alex Deucher:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Christian König
> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>> Am 11.07.2014 18:05, schrieb Jerome Glisse:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:50:02AM +0300, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>>>> To support HSA on KV, we need to limit the number of vmids and pipes
>>>> that are available for radeon's use with KV.
>>>>
>>>> This patch reserves VMIDs 8-15 for KFD (so radeon can only use VMIDs
>>>> 0-7) and also makes radeon thinks that KV has only a single MEC with a
>>>> single
>>>> pipe in it
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@....com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
>>
>> At least fro the VMIDs on demand allocation should be trivial to implement,
>> so I would rather prefer this instead of a fixed assignment.
> IIRC, the way the CP hw scheduler works you have to give it a range of
> vmids and it assigns them dynamically as queues are mapped so
> effectively they are potentially in use once the CP scheduler is set
> up.
That's not what I meant. Changing it completely on the fly is nice to
have, but we should at least make it configurable as a module parameter.
And even if we hardcode it we should use a define for it somewhere
instead of hardcoding 8 VMIDs on the KGD side and 8 VMIDs on KFD side
without any relation to each other.
Christian.
> Alex
>
>
>> Christian.
>>
>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c | 48
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>>> index 4bfc2c0..e0c8052 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
>>>> @@ -4662,12 +4662,11 @@ static int cik_mec_init(struct radeon_device
>>>> *rdev)
>>>> /*
>>>> * KV: 2 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 64 Queues total
>>>> * CI/KB: 1 MEC, 4 Pipes/MEC, 8 Queues/Pipe - 32 Queues total
>>>> + * Nonetheless, we assign only 1 pipe because all other pipes
>>>> will
>>>> + * be handled by KFD
>>>> */
>>>> - if (rdev->family == CHIP_KAVERI)
>>>> - rdev->mec.num_mec = 2;
>>>> - else
>>>> - rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>>>> - rdev->mec.num_pipe = 4;
>>>> + rdev->mec.num_mec = 1;
>>>> + rdev->mec.num_pipe = 1;
>>>> rdev->mec.num_queue = rdev->mec.num_mec * rdev->mec.num_pipe * 8;
>>>> if (rdev->mec.hpd_eop_obj == NULL) {
>>>> @@ -4809,28 +4808,24 @@ static int cik_cp_compute_resume(struct
>>>> radeon_device *rdev)
>>>> /* init the pipes */
>>>> mutex_lock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < (rdev->mec.num_pipe * rdev->mec.num_mec); i++) {
>>>> - int me = (i < 4) ? 1 : 2;
>>>> - int pipe = (i < 4) ? i : (i - 4);
>>>> - eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr + (i *
>>>> MEC_HPD_SIZE * 2);
>>>> + eop_gpu_addr = rdev->mec.hpd_eop_gpu_addr;
>>>> - cik_srbm_select(rdev, me, pipe, 0, 0);
>>>> + cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>>>> - /* write the EOP addr */
>>>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>>>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI,
>>>> upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >> 8);
>>>> + /* write the EOP addr */
>>>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR, eop_gpu_addr >> 8);
>>>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_BASE_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(eop_gpu_addr) >>
>>>> 8);
>>>> - /* set the VMID assigned */
>>>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>>>> + /* set the VMID assigned */
>>>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_VMID, 0);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1) dwords */
>>>> + tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>>>> + tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>>>> + tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>>>> + WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>>>> - /* set the EOP size, register value is 2^(EOP_SIZE+1)
>>>> dwords */
>>>> - tmp = RREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL);
>>>> - tmp &= ~EOP_SIZE_MASK;
>>>> - tmp |= order_base_2(MEC_HPD_SIZE / 8);
>>>> - WREG32(CP_HPD_EOP_CONTROL, tmp);
>>>> - }
>>>> - cik_srbm_select(rdev, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>>>> mutex_unlock(&rdev->srbm_mutex);
>>>> /* init the queues. Just two for now. */
>>>> @@ -5876,8 +5871,13 @@ int cik_ib_parse(struct radeon_device *rdev,
>>>> struct radeon_ib *ib)
>>>> */
>>>> int cik_vm_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>>>> {
>>>> - /* number of VMs */
>>>> - rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 16;
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * number of VMs
>>>> + * VMID 0 is reserved for Graphics
>>>> + * radeon compute will use VMIDs 1-7
>>>> + * KFD will use VMIDs 8-15
>>>> + */
>>>> + rdev->vm_manager.nvm = 8;
>>>> /* base offset of vram pages */
>>>> if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_IGP) {
>>>> u64 tmp = RREG32(MC_VM_FB_OFFSET);
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists