[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53C2B9D3.6040500@semaphore.gr>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 19:54:43 +0300
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org
CC: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
Hi Doug,
On 12/07/2014 06:45 μμ, Doug Smythies wrote:
>
> On 2014.07.30 10:00 Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>
>> This patchset changes slightly the calculation of target frequency to
>> eliminate the deadband effect (explained in patch 2 changelog) that it
>> seems to slow down the CPU in low and medium loads.
>>
>> Patch 1 introduces a new relation (RELATION_C) for the next frequency
>> selection, which chooses the closest frequency to target.
>>
>> Patch 2 is the actual change to ondemand governor.
>
>> You may find graphs with the 'deadband' effect and benchmark results:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16kDBh5lyc6YvBnoS1hUa1t2O38z0xrWvaEj5XtJ8auw/edit#gid=2072493052
>
> I did the same benchmark tests before (without) and after (with) this patch set on my i7-2600K system.
> I added the results, which are similar to Stratos', under a new "benchmark" tab on the spreadsheet.
Thank you very much for your benchmarks!
Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists