linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of 'die' to avoid compiling issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140713225013.GB9681@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:50:13 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, oleg.drokin@...el.com, paf@...y.com,
	andreas.dilger@...el.com, Andriy_Skulysh@...atex.com,
	bergwolf@...il.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	denis.pithon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: lustre: Use 'force_die' instead of
 'die' to avoid compiling issue

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 06:38:24AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 06:31 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> > On 07/14/2014 05:41 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> On 07/14/2014 03:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:50:55PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> >>>> Some of architectures have already defined 'die' as macro, so can not use
> >>>> this common name as declaration in other modules, or will cause compiling
> >>>> issue. So use more precise name 'force_die' (like 'wrap_bulk') instead of.
> >>>>
> >>>> The related error (with allmodconfig under score):
> >>>>
> >>>>     CC [M]  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'sptlrpc_cli_ctx_expire':
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:309:13: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
> >>>>     ctx->cc_ops->die(ctx, 0);
> >>>>                ^
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c: In function 'ctx_refresh_timeout':
> >>>>   drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c:594:26: error: 'struct ptlrpc_ctx_ops' has no member named '__die'
> >>>>      req->rq_cli_ctx->cc_ops->die(req->rq_cli_ctx, 0);
> >>>>                             ^
> >>>>   make[5]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.o] Error 1
> >>>>   make[4]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc] Error 2
> >>>>   make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre/lustre] Error 2
> >>>>   make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/lustre] Error 2
> >>>>   make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
> >>>>   make: *** [drivers] Error 2
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre_sec.h | 2 +-
> >>>>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec.c         | 6 +++---
> >>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> This doesn't apply to my tree, can you please refresh it against the
> >>> staging-next branch of staging.git so that I can apply it?
> >>>
> > 
> > 
> > After checkout, I get the same patch, the related git link:
> > 
> >   "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git".
> 
> Oh, sorry, maybe I need:
> 
>   "git clone -b staging-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git"
> 
> And I shall try again, and finish within 2 days.

Yes, you need the staging-next branch.

You can take your original clone of:
	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git

and then just check out the staging-next branch in it:
	git checkout -t -b staging-next origin/staging-next

no need to do another full clone.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/