[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140713010546.GA2832@dhcp-17-102.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:05:46 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] not adding modules range to kcore if it's equal to
vmcore range
On some ARCHs modules range is eauql to vmalloc range. E.g on i686
"#define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START"
"#define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END"
This will cause 2 duplicate program segments in /proc/kcore, makes
user confused. In this patch a judgment added to check if modules
range is equal to vmalloc range. If yes, just skip adding the modules
range.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
fs/proc/kcore.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
index 39e6ef3..bf5127c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
+++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
@@ -610,8 +610,10 @@ static void __init proc_kcore_text_init(void)
struct kcore_list kcore_modules;
static void __init add_modules_range(void)
{
- kclist_add(&kcore_modules, (void *)MODULES_VADDR,
- MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR, KCORE_VMALLOC);
+ if (MODULES_VADDR != VMALLOC_START) {
+ kclist_add(&kcore_modules, (void *)MODULES_VADDR,
+ MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR, KCORE_VMALLOC);
+ }
}
#else
static void __init add_modules_range(void)
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists