[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140715151600.b561ab770b5b0f9a2200b49f@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:16:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qiuxishi@...wei.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] not adding modules range to kcore if it's equal to
vmcore range
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:05:46 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
> On some ARCHs modules range is eauql to vmalloc range. E.g on i686
> "#define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START"
> "#define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END"
> This will cause 2 duplicate program segments in /proc/kcore, makes
> user confused. In this patch a judgment added to check if modules
> range is equal to vmalloc range. If yes, just skip adding the modules
> range.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -610,8 +610,10 @@ static void __init proc_kcore_text_init(void)
> struct kcore_list kcore_modules;
> static void __init add_modules_range(void)
> {
> - kclist_add(&kcore_modules, (void *)MODULES_VADDR,
> - MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR, KCORE_VMALLOC);
> + if (MODULES_VADDR != VMALLOC_START) {
> + kclist_add(&kcore_modules, (void *)MODULES_VADDR,
> + MODULES_END - MODULES_VADDR, KCORE_VMALLOC);
> + }
> }
> #else
> static void __init add_modules_range(void)
But if some application or script is using the modules range, won't
this patch cause breakage on some architectures?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists