| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1407141022580.13527@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:26:39 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Turn the unlinked inode counter into a percpu
counter
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:23:39 -0700
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
> Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> Subject: [PATCH] vfs: Turn the unlinked inode counter into a percpu counter
>
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> The unlinked open inodes super block counter that was added some time ago
> unfortunately becomes a very hot cache line in some delete heavy
> high IOPs or tmpfs workloads with enough cores, when files
> are frequently removed. With TSX it also causes plenty of aborts.
>
> Turn the atomic into a percpu_counter. It's nearly perfectly
> suited for a percpu counter because it is only checked
> in very slow paths, like remount.
>
> Original commit:
>
> commit 7ada4db88634429f4da690ad1c4eb73c93085f0c
> Author: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> Date: Mon Nov 21 12:11:32 2011 +0100
>
> vfs: count unlinked inodes
>
> Add a new counter to the superblock that keeps track of unlinked but
> not yet deleted inodes.
>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> fs/ext2/super.c | 2 +-
> fs/inode.c | 14 ++++++--------
> fs/namespace.c | 4 ++--
> fs/super.c | 3 +++
> include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index 3750031..ac0ad9a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static int ext2_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
> * because we have unattached inodes and thus filesystem is not fully
> * consistent.
> */
> - if (atomic_long_read(&sb->s_remove_count)) {
> + if (percpu_counter_sum(&sb->s_remove_counters)) {
> ext2_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index f96d2a6..4820c35 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -234,10 +234,8 @@ void __destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> BUG_ON(inode_has_buffers(inode));
> security_inode_free(inode);
> fsnotify_inode_delete(inode);
> - if (!inode->i_nlink) {
> - WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count) == 0);
This is not mentioned in the description, but I guess it makes sense since
it'd be quite expensive.
-Lukas
> - atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
> - }
> + if (!inode->i_nlink)
> + percpu_counter_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_counters);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> if (inode->i_acl && inode->i_acl != ACL_NOT_CACHED)
> @@ -281,7 +279,7 @@ void drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
> WARN_ON(inode->i_nlink == 0);
> inode->__i_nlink--;
> if (!inode->i_nlink)
> - atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
> + percpu_counter_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_counters);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drop_nlink);
>
> @@ -297,7 +295,7 @@ void clear_nlink(struct inode *inode)
> {
> if (inode->i_nlink) {
> inode->__i_nlink = 0;
> - atomic_long_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
> + percpu_counter_inc(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_counters);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_nlink);
> @@ -317,7 +315,7 @@ void set_nlink(struct inode *inode, unsigned int nlink)
> } else {
> /* Yes, some filesystems do change nlink from zero to one */
> if (inode->i_nlink == 0)
> - atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
> + percpu_counter_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_counters);
>
> inode->__i_nlink = nlink;
> }
> @@ -336,7 +334,7 @@ void inc_nlink(struct inode *inode)
> {
> if (unlikely(inode->i_nlink == 0)) {
> WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_LINKABLE));
> - atomic_long_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_count);
> + percpu_counter_dec(&inode->i_sb->s_remove_counters);
> }
>
> inode->__i_nlink++;
> diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
> index 182bc41..20d33d9 100644
> --- a/fs/namespace.c
> +++ b/fs/namespace.c
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ int sb_prepare_remount_readonly(struct super_block *sb)
> int err = 0;
>
> /* Racy optimization. Recheck the counter under MNT_WRITE_HOLD */
> - if (atomic_long_read(&sb->s_remove_count))
> + if (percpu_counter_sum(&sb->s_remove_counters) != 0)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> lock_mount_hash();
> @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ int sb_prepare_remount_readonly(struct super_block *sb)
> }
> }
> }
> - if (!err && atomic_long_read(&sb->s_remove_count))
> + if (!err && percpu_counter_sum(&sb->s_remove_counters) != 0)
> err = -EBUSY;
>
> if (!err) {
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 48377f7..b7a8a45 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static void destroy_super(struct super_block *s)
> list_lru_destroy(&s->s_inode_lru);
> for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++)
> percpu_counter_destroy(&s->s_writers.counter[i]);
> + percpu_counter_destroy(&s->s_remove_counters);
> security_sb_free(s);
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&s->s_mounts));
> kfree(s->s_subtype);
> @@ -171,6 +172,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags)
> if (security_sb_alloc(s))
> goto fail;
>
> + if (percpu_counter_init(&s->s_remove_counters, 0) < 0)
> + goto fail;
> for (i = 0; i < SB_FREEZE_LEVELS; i++) {
> if (percpu_counter_init(&s->s_writers.counter[i], 0) < 0)
> goto fail;
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 8780312..0374552 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ struct super_block {
> struct shrinker s_shrink; /* per-sb shrinker handle */
>
> /* Number of inodes with nlink == 0 but still referenced */
> - atomic_long_t s_remove_count;
> + struct percpu_counter s_remove_counters;
>
> /* Being remounted read-only */
> int s_readonly_remount;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists