[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokxmrFz+4x+V3MeEuKgnzQoETWLA_0aZHhhE6=+MvQP1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:40:58 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix latency for cpufreq_info
On 14 July 2014 10:31, Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com> wrote:
> This fixes the latency for the cpufreq policy to 1 million nanoseconds
> that calls the function pxa_cpu_init for the member of the structure
> called cpuinfo.transition_latency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> index e24269a..e08bb98 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int pxa_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> init_sdram_rows();
>
> /* set default policy and cpuinfo */
> - policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000; /* FIXME: 1 ms, assumed */
> + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000, 000;
Have you tried testing this at all? This patch wouldn't change anything.
Still 1000 will get assigned to latency :)
Get rid of the comma.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists