[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVz7a7RVLhYTrGvHkJR2dGHJbRuATOaWaXgkrSABR7YFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:15:57 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is espfix64's double-fault thing OK on Xen?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:04 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2014 04:17 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> This part in __do_double_fault looks fishy:
>>>
>>> cmpl $__KERNEL_CS,CS(%rdi)
>>> jne do_double_fault
>>>
>>> Shouldn't that be:
>>>
>>> test $3,CS(%rdi)
>>> jnz do_double_fault
>>>
>>
>> No, it should be fine. The *only* case where we need to do the espfix
>> magic is when we are on __KERNEL_CS.
>>
>
> IIRC Xen has a somewhat different GDT, and at least the userspace CS
> in IA32_STAR disagrees with normal Linux. If the kernel CS is also
> strange, then there will be an extra possible CS value here.
There's FLAT_KERNEL_CS64, which is not equal to __KERNEL_CS. If the
espfix mechanism gets invoked with that CS, then I expect that
something unexpected will happen.
That being said, FLAT_KERNEL_CS64 is CPL3, so my code might not be any better.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists