linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] regulator: qcom-rpm: Regulator driver for the Qualcomm RPM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:30:10 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
Cc:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] regulator: qcom-rpm: Regulator driver for the
 Qualcomm RPM

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:15:16PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I have patch 3/3 here but no cover or other patches - what is the story
> > there?

> I forgot to add you as explicit recipient of the other mails in the
> series, sorry about that. Please let me know if you would like to have
> them resent.

I mostly want to know about the dependencies - I guess the first couple
of patches define the QCOM_RPM interface, is that stable enough to go
ahead with the regulator driver for example?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)